For full access to print, digital and audio editions, as well as exclusive live events, subscribe to The Economist at /uspod. You can now find every episode of Checks and Balance in one place and sign up to our weekly newsletter. ![]() John Prideaux hosts with Charlotte Howard and Idrees Kahloon. And former head of Human Rights Watch Kenneth Roth recounts his own fight for academic freedom. ![]() We go back to when professors took a stand against anti-communism. How healthy is academic freedom in America?ĭean of Berkeley Law Erwin Chemerinsky makes the case for diversity statements, while NYU’s Jonathan Haidt argues against them. At the same time some Republican-led states, most notably Florida, are putting their own restrictions on academia. These ask applicants to set out their commitment to, and experience of, promoting diversity, equity and inclusion. More and more universities across America now require would-be professors to submit so-called diversity statements. Sign up for our new weekly newsletter dissecting the big themes in markets, business and the economy at For full access to print, digital and audio editions, subscribe to The Economist at Hosted on Acast. And short-seller Andrew Left describes what it’s like to hit send on a report that’s intended to crash a firm’s stock price. Analyst Mahesh Vyas considers the impact on Adani’s ability to borrow to fund infrastructure projects. The Economist’s Mumbai bureau chief, Tom Easton, talks them through Hindenburg’s report and Adani’s response. On this week’s podcast, hosts Mike Bird, Alice Fulwood and Tom Lee-Devlin examine the allegations levelled at Adani’s firms, which the company has forcefully denied. But he was caught short when Hindenburg Research, a small American short-seller, issued a report that spooked investors, wiping $100bn from the value of Adani firms. And that's my review of The Angry Birds Movie 2.Just weeks ago, Gautam Adani was the third richest person in the world. You'll be sorry for this Modern-Trashy AB Fans. I just want to make a better reboot of Angry Birds Movie for Disney, but they never listen to me or Disney, they didn't want to make it happened, I'm not moving forward for some 2016 trashy-era of Angry Birds. Hatching story doing same this as Scrat story from Ice Age Films, and replaced The Blues and Stella as Background Characters? I'm sorry you guys, but you all just being enjoy of Crappy Angry Birds Movie 2. And who else think that's worst nightmare? You guess it, Dub, fortnite dance, selfies, and Baby Shark, also the dirty joke was pig wearing underwears. My idea for The Angry Birds Movie 2 was Red and Stella want to keep Luca as adopted parents, but Sony stoled my idea and replaced with Terence, Matilda, and Zoe?!? What a lack, you made Bombtilda fans breaking heart into pieces, you know what grind my gears, you Sony, your support to make Offical Redella scene, not Redilver scene, and more immortal you gonna tearing Redella fans' heart into pieces just like Bombtilda fans. ![]() Another opinion is about Matilda and Terence. what the heck is Sony did this to her? It Support to be original, not changing design it like original 2019 version trailer of Sonic The Hedgehog Movie. ![]() It all started by war between Birds and pig, that was original Angry Birds. More importantly The Angry Birds Movie 2 was nothing but cringy, lack of Original Angry Birds 2 design and Story, and memes like Baby Shark. You would expect to watch The Angry Birds Movie 2? I Don't think so. This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |